Replacement finder

Replace Tyrick Mitchell

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Crystal Palace would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

2

G+A

3

Shots

19

SoT

7

Crosses

104

Fouls won

28

Tackles won

65

Interceptions

33

Attack

37

Creation

48

Progression

55

Role score

53

Transfer fit

71

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (85.85869546083548%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€20.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Udinese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (83.90831505894104%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€19.4M.

Open comparison →

Everton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (80.62425979641029%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+19); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Roma · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (85.2128062231662%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€10.6M.

Open comparison →

Leeds United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (81.15627040943288%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+19); cheaper by ~€7.7M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Leeds United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (81.54499693790332%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€10.2M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Pisa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (80.71087659955246%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+11); cheaper by ~€20.9M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Fredrik Oppegard

Auxerre · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (82.90764369185474%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€22.1M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Djibril Sidibé

Toulouse · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (84.28158902041645%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€21.9M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Cristian Cásseres Jr.

Toulouse · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (78.308348061622%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18); cheaper by ~€16.6M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Robin Fellhauer

Augsburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (80.03071070208479%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€20.4M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Fulham · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (78.95848412167294%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+13); cheaper by ~€11.7M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Romano Floriani

Cremonese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (83.22065331608253%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-14); cheaper by ~€13.9M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Auxerre · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (80.32335422681834%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+13); cheaper by ~€10.4M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Kassoum Ouattara

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Defensive Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (78.74204346023762%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+19); cheaper by ~€11.4M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (76.45384862795223%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+16); cheaper by ~€17.2M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

West Ham United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (80.04642546489335%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€12.6M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Brooke Norton-Cuffy

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (80.06560146463175%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€6.5M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →