Replacement finder

Replace Teun Koopmeiners

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Juventus would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

0

Assists

0

G+A

0

Shots

28

SoT

7

Crosses

47

Fouls won

11

Tackles won

13

Interceptions

18

Attack

51

Creation

43

Progression

39

Role score

44

Transfer fit

57

Filter:

Closest profile

Everton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (85.69808048733972%); tactical fit is good; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Cameron Puertas

Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (80.67384167649088%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+22); cheaper by ~€11.1M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Lazio · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (84.14458633078374%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€15.2M.

Open comparison →

Hakan Çalhanoğlu

Inter · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (81.36272442873043%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+24).

Open comparison →

Fulham · Premier League · Attacking Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (79.76676015841281%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+22).

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Real Sociedad · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (81.16530080550392%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+13); cheaper by ~€11.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Pisa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (80.47678640231774%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); cheaper by ~€13.1M.

Open comparison →

Fulham · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (81.28255876657396%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+20); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Lazio · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (80.68481965181516%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); cheaper by ~€16.3M.

Open comparison →

Brentford · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (78.79030267180406%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+29); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Leeds United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (78.91557850903638%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+16); cheaper by ~€8.1M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Inter · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (79.73056519953616%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Hamburger SV · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (81.42106581419311%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€17.9M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Union Berlin · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (81.8898543214694%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); cheaper by ~€8.6M; 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Marcus Tavernier

Bournemouth · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (77.58388326312803%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+22); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Rayo Vallecano · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (80.33591469805287%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); cheaper by ~€16.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Ruslan Malinovskyi

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (79.65006736405789%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+17); cheaper by ~€16.3M.

Open comparison →

Manchester City · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (76.61542236621922%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+27); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →