Replacement finder

Replace Sebastian Szymański

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Rennes would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

3

G+A

4

Shots

12

SoT

5

Crosses

56

Fouls won

12

Tackles won

10

Interceptions

3

Attack

69

Creation

84

Progression

64

Role score

57

Transfer fit

46

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Álex Berenguer

Athletic Club · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (88.55935102237581%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18); cheaper by ~€7.4M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Espanyol · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (88.11547092238145%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+19); cheaper by ~€9M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Alavés · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (89.57524833756415%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€11.7M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Union Berlin · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (87.79003501799342%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€8.4M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Alavés · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (87.39589165974404%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+12); cheaper by ~€9.3M.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Alavés · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (84.55644477718687%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+22); cheaper by ~€11.1M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Joaquín Martínez Gauna

Sevilla · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (89.15756133691806%); tactical fit is good; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Heorhii Tsitaishvili

Metz · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (88.06167181311999%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€10.3M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Omari Hutchinson

Nottingham Forest · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (88.19212125335002%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Valencia · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (87.61839479243908%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€10.5M.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Jan-Niklas Beste

Freiburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (82.45263861895913%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+24); cheaper by ~€5.1M.

Open comparison →

Mainz 05 · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (85.98326503048168%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+12); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Jari Vandeputte

Cremonese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (85.1870263390518%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); cheaper by ~€8.4M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Levante · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (85.30847060572528%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+10); cheaper by ~€10.7M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Mallorca · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (86.5139537800155%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€9.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Branco van den Boomen

Angers · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (86.63555325023303%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€10.2M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Brighton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (86.06760157961502%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+13); 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Federico Dimarco

Inter · Serie A · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (81.94388525243824%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18).

Open comparison →