Replacement finder

Replace Pervis Estupiñán

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Milan would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

1

G+A

2

Shots

9

SoT

1

Crosses

20

Fouls won

8

Tackles won

9

Interceptions

11

Attack

45

Creation

58

Progression

36

Role score

47

Transfer fit

51

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Pisa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (83.42272182412559%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+11); cheaper by ~€7.1M.

Open comparison →

Leeds United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (82.53428915138437%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+13); cheaper by ~€2.1M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Marcel Sabitzer

Dortmund · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (85.68356536123821%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€5.7M.

Open comparison →

Crystal Palace · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (83.79686906635598%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+21); 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Inter · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (82.41222176289239%); tactical fit is good; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Manchester City · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (83.2378320103563%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Leverkusen · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (83.1020072303725%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9); cheaper by ~€6.4M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Cristian Cásseres Jr.

Toulouse · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (79.20083776323337%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+24); cheaper by ~€6.5M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Mikkel Damsgaard

Brentford · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (78.91641578530869%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+26); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Ander Barrenetxea

Real Sociedad · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (78.77655968176919%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+27); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (78.59771294925513%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+37); 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Gladbach · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (79.47963054292276%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+27); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Bologna · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (80.23809882119961%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€6.2M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Lens · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (78.00954853736265%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+23); cheaper by ~€8.1M.

Open comparison →

Crystal Palace · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (77.82418995459079%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18).

Open comparison →

Maxence Caqueret

Como · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (78.39188039990071%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+21); 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (77.23392214918135%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+22); cheaper by ~€7.1M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Gladbach · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (77.1893297479494%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+32); cheaper by ~€9.8M.

Open comparison →