Replacement finder

Replace Oumar Solet

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Udinese would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

3

Assists

1

G+A

4

Shots

33

SoT

6

Crosses

20

Fouls won

29

Tackles won

57

Interceptions

47

Attack

0

Creation

0

Progression

84

Role score

86

Transfer fit

83

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Sevilla · La Liga · Center Back · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (88.54485280545131%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€10M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

St Pauli · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (88.47682593247104%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); cheaper by ~€16M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Valentín Gómez

Real Betis · La Liga · Center Back · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (89.8849264341292%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-19); cheaper by ~€7.6M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Jeanuël Belocian

Wolfsburg · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (89.59604886705159%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-17); cheaper by ~€5.9M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Leonardo Balerdi

Marseille · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (86.50473498377782%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-13); cheaper by ~€600K.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Valencia · La Liga · Center Back · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (88.8171202991641%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-22); cheaper by ~€15.5M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Hamburger SV · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (84.71210986304595%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€15.4M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Juan Rodríguez

Cagliari · Serie A · Center Back · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (88.10037841557066%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€14.1M; 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (83.84723259355059%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€14.9M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Zé Pedro Figueiredo

Cagliari · Serie A · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (88.27949529346849%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-28); cheaper by ~€11.6M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Torino · Serie A · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (85.67471692810149%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-18); cheaper by ~€9.5M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Jordan Torunarigha

Hamburger SV · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (84.965799797533%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); cheaper by ~€14.7M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Andrias Edmundsson

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Center Back · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (83.39493594029294%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€16.2M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Robin Le Normand

Atlético Madrid · La Liga · Center Back · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (86.74123739964007%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-24).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Atalanta · Serie A · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (84.34580962149735%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Leo Skiri Østigård

Genoa · Serie A · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (85.90169192423643%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-26); cheaper by ~€7.8M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Paris FC · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (83.6910903791365%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); cheaper by ~€13.3M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Dortmund · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (85.2808561496819%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11).

Open comparison →