Replacement finder

Replace Nicolás Paz

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Como would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

12

Assists

6

G+A

18

Shots

121

SoT

48

Crosses

63

Fouls won

41

Tackles won

56

Interceptions

27

Attack

92

Creation

74

Progression

66

Role score

77

Transfer fit

81

Filter:

Closest profile

Barcelona · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (84.71518885801494%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Freiburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (85.5581440832988%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-24); cheaper by ~€23.4M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Brest · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (81.80244064340323%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9); cheaper by ~€34.4M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Antoine Semenyo

Bournemouth · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (84.83781226523156%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-26).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Alberto Moleiro

Villarreal · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (80.74712642229194%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-19); cheaper by ~€9M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Nicolás González

Atlético Madrid · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (81.8010718894416%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); cheaper by ~€17M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Liverpool · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (80.03557389530123%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-15).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Angers · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (80.62451805026033%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-22); cheaper by ~€37.4M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Aston Villa · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (80.02857284078401%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-18).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Jack Hinshelwood

Brighton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (80.29287740336102%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-29); cheaper by ~€21M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Khéphren Thuram

Juventus · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (79.73398455961423%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-26); cheaper by ~€4M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (79.9487022109229%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-17); cheaper by ~€27.6M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (75.34346364337523%); tactical fit is good; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Manchester Utd · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (75.9455834438752%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Barcelona · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (77.40876612499301%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Bayern Munich · Bundesliga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 18

Strong stylistic match (75.73978913330801%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Paris Saint-Germain · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (76.48751107109615%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-22).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Morgan Gibbs-White

Nottingham Forest · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (79.45971849756769%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-25).

Open comparison →