Replacement finder

Replace Morten Thorsby

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Cremonese would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

0

G+A

1

Shots

11

SoT

4

Crosses

0

Fouls won

6

Tackles won

6

Interceptions

3

Attack

60

Creation

23

Progression

26

Role score

30

Transfer fit

34

Filter:

Junior Dina Ebimbe

Brest · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (86.51822548549677%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+20); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (80.88807667896019%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+30); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Torino · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (84.43494417239731%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+13); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Grischa Prömel

Hoffenheim · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (76.54188118075024%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+34).

Open comparison →

Christoph Baumgartner

RB Leipzig · Bundesliga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (78.71285931544851%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+33); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Aston Villa · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (75.87113385614407%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+37); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Alexis Mac Allister

Liverpool · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (79.07213241110266%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Scott McTominay

Napoli · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (76.09951625259812%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+25); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Manchester Utd · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 34

Reasonable profile overlap (74.55968010771932%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+36).

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Paris FC · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Reasonable profile overlap (74.79956430131641%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+23); cheaper by ~€2.1M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Reasonable profile overlap (74.31660266925624%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+23); cheaper by ~€100K; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Emile Smith Rowe

Fulham · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (75.93234599988519%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+21); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Alessandro Deiola

Cagliari · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (75.18823276485188%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€1.8M.

Open comparison →

Brest · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (75.08469804667122%); tactical fit is workable; upgrade on role score (+32); cheaper by ~€100K; 8 years younger.

Open comparison →

Barcelona · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Reasonable profile overlap (69.94857681645429%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+45); 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Mauro Arambarri

Getafe · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Reasonable profile overlap (71.62355267323393%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+23).

Open comparison →

Maximilian Eggestein

Freiburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Reasonable profile overlap (73.60091582875646%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Bologna · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (75.06525746206023%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →