Replacement finder

Replace Mohamed Ali Cho

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Nice would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

4

Assists

3

G+A

7

Shots

32

SoT

14

Crosses

39

Fouls won

32

Tackles won

9

Interceptions

4

Attack

51

Creation

72

Progression

63

Role score

60

Transfer fit

64

Filter:

Closest profile

Samuel Mbangula

Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · Creative Winger · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (84.89054024822286%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€5.4M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Roma · Serie A · Creative Winger · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (82.71086599183155%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Maghnes Akliouche

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Creative Winger · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (83.14405234739891%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

RB Leipzig · Bundesliga · Goal Threat Winger · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (80.90410400395368%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+12); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Hamburger SV · Bundesliga · Creative Winger · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (83.40645865588732%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Matias Fernandez-Pardo

Lille · Ligue 1 · Creative Winger · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (80.05542987734202%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+12); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Newcastle United · Premier League · Goal Threat Winger · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (80.02849240548883%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Nikola Vlašić

Torino · Serie A · Creative Winger · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (85.75890169428686%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); cheaper by ~€5.2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Jean Mattéo Bahoya

Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga · Creative Winger · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (81.83844639156383%); tactical fit is good; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Domenico Berardi

Sassuolo · Serie A · Creative Winger · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (84.45908534873705%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); cheaper by ~€6.4M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Brenden Aaronson

Leeds United · Premier League · Creative Winger · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (82.97450331389626%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Villarreal · La Liga · Creative Winger · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (83.1336673854679%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+12); cheaper by ~€7.9M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Real Sociedad · La Liga · Creative Winger · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (82.71685218562428%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); cheaper by ~€2.9M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Gianluca Gaetano

Cagliari · Serie A · Creative Winger · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (85.40730475742345%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-18); cheaper by ~€10.6M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Juventus · Serie A · Creative Winger · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (78.00806033829939%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+20); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Wolves · Premier League · Inside Forward · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (86.56277238282296%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-20); cheaper by ~€5.1M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Wolfsburg · Bundesliga · Creative Winger · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (82.46983067527324%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€6.4M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Lazio · Serie A · Creative Winger · Age 38

Strong stylistic match (86.3813426181385%); tactical fit is workable; upgrade on role score (+9); cheaper by ~€13.5M.

Open comparison →