Replacement finder

Replace Mateus Fernandes

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What West Ham United would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

3

Assists

4

G+A

7

Shots

28

SoT

8

Crosses

51

Fouls won

49

Tackles won

67

Interceptions

36

Attack

43

Creation

55

Progression

69

Role score

62

Transfer fit

75

Filter:

Closest profile

Nathaniel Brown

Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (84.12972220313836%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (82.36692275237212%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Lille · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 18

Strong stylistic match (82.17505830435036%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Samir El Mourabet

Strasbourg · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (79.54760834531123%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); cheaper by ~€16.5M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (81.8352922210948%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-16); cheaper by ~€8M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Heidenheim · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (83.21871362739304%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€31.2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Lorient · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (78.1917548728964%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€13M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Michel Aebischer

Pisa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (82.78260264508208%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); cheaper by ~€29.3M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Youri Tielemans

Aston Villa · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (79.77565455144901%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Antoine Bernede

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (81.4861330198432%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-17); cheaper by ~€30.6M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Manchester Utd · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (78.74063663202242%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-17).

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Crystal Palace · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (80.10267918721084%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€21.6M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (80.08588579907344%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); cheaper by ~€31.7M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Yassin Belkhdim

Angers · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (77.54780384292164%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€27.2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Christian Ordoñez

Parma · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (79.1780244554246%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-26); cheaper by ~€26.9M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Real Sociedad · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (77.0544043799245%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9); cheaper by ~€25.6M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Mamadou Coulibaly

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (76.00956426709564%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€19.9M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Sevilla · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (80.51171739870777%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); cheaper by ~€26.9M.

Open comparison →