Replacement finder

Replace Mason Mount

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Manchester Utd would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

3

Assists

0

G+A

3

Shots

19

SoT

5

Crosses

22

Fouls won

12

Tackles won

13

Interceptions

9

Attack

77

Creation

68

Progression

48

Role score

63

Transfer fit

59

Filter:

Closest profile

Everton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (85.04618695955688%); tactical fit is good; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Wolfsburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (85.18041055669873%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€11.9M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Leverkusen · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (86.31942142235135%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+15); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Aleksandr Golovin

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Attacking Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (84.30338232167776%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€10.5M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Le Havre · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (83.91185812933645%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€23.2M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Manchester Utd · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (82.63871152523683%); tactical fit is good; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Henrikh Mkhitaryan

Inter · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 37

Strong stylistic match (85.32980641767698%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); cheaper by ~€24.6M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Angers · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (84.08631547223885%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); cheaper by ~€23.4M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Jurgen Ekkelenkamp

Udinese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (81.84552549696592%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9); cheaper by ~€20.8M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Newcastle United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (82.05093802506715%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€11.4M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Giuliano Simeone

Atlético Madrid · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (79.83342940104029%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+13); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Enzo Fernández

Chelsea · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (79.20874479059272%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Lille · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (81.08921070688814%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€22.5M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Piotr Zieliński

Inter · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (82.8948545579021%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); cheaper by ~€17.7M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Maxence Caqueret

Como · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (77.71187336693389%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€12.5M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Levante · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (79.56940562595969%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€26.5M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Ruslan Malinovskyi

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (80.83800749284919%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€25.4M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Jesus Rodríguez

Como · Serie A · Attacking Midfielder · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (80.08920387961139%); tactical fit is good; 7 years younger.

Open comparison →