Replacement finder

Replace Mason Greenwood

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Marseille would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

16

Assists

7

G+A

23

Shots

116

SoT

48

Crosses

112

Fouls won

34

Tackles won

13

Interceptions

4

Attack

96

Creation

84

Progression

68

Role score

69

Transfer fit

66

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Bournemouth · Premier League · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (84.66947052268155%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€36.2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Athletic Club · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (84.51166035715917%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-17); cheaper by ~€43.8M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Tijjani Reijnders

Manchester City · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (84.92044663956355%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-13).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Kamaldeen Sulemana

Atalanta · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (78.76716850106065%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9); cheaper by ~€31.5M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Marseille · Ligue 1 · Attacking Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (78.33368031983217%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€16M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Enzo Fernández

Chelsea · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (76.42027155944737%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Sebastian Nanasi

Strasbourg · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (79.28670862271754%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-23); cheaper by ~€33.5M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Barcelona · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (76.37594643926235%); tactical fit is good; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Marcus Tavernier

Bournemouth · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (77.49494743292792%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€28M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Fulham · Premier League · Attacking Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (76.86971337243521%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€22M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Freiburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (75.6543524277694%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-16); cheaper by ~€30.4M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Bournemouth · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 19

Strong stylistic match (78.24666274042983%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-15); cheaper by ~€10M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Athletic Club · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Reasonable profile overlap (73.24555786508076%); tactical fit is good; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Antoine Semenyo

Bournemouth · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (76.31917506764172%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-18).

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Como · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Reasonable profile overlap (73.05356960051483%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); cheaper by ~€7M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Jesus Rodríguez

Como · Serie A · Attacking Midfielder · Age 20

Reasonable profile overlap (73.943766696488%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€17M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Ruslan Malinovskyi

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (78.1390490524838%); tactical fit is workable; weaker role score (-8); cheaper by ~€46.4M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Leverkusen · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 20

Reasonable profile overlap (72.6693318639636%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9); cheaper by ~€12M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →