Replacement finder

Replace Lorenzo Bernasconi

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Atalanta would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

0

Assists

3

G+A

3

Shots

9

SoT

1

Crosses

113

Fouls won

5

Tackles won

16

Interceptions

14

Attack

47

Creation

77

Progression

42

Role score

55

Transfer fit

55

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Valentino Lazaro

Torino · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (89.99495770151032%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€11.7M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Jonathan Clauss

Nice · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (88.43376064371205%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+15); cheaper by ~€11.4M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Domagoj Bradarić

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (87.16239289796628%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); cheaper by ~€12.8M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Emanuele Valeri

Parma · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (85.88151910237237%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€12.6M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Davide Bartesaghi

Milan · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (84.39076704533407%); tactical fit is good; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Dortmund · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (85.8251399143299%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (82.89378780623731%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€2.5M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (85.03024496736944%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+12); cheaper by ~€8.7M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Jackson Tchatchoua

Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (85.72074492348372%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-13); cheaper by ~€2.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Jari Vandeputte

Cremonese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (84.01250866838028%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+16); cheaper by ~€11.3M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Marcus Pedersen

Torino · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (86.13901779066019%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-13); cheaper by ~€12.2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Daniel Svensson

Dortmund · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (82.15471642111831%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Torino · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (84.46469500987575%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-14); cheaper by ~€13.4M.

Open comparison →

Federico Dimarco

Inter · Serie A · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (81.50151374140128%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+20).

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Brighton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 34

Strong stylistic match (86.65138441655883%); tactical fit is workable; cheaper by ~€12.3M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

David Møller Wolfe

Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (85.11876167254792%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-16); cheaper by ~€6.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Espanyol · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (81.50875989867646%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+21); cheaper by ~€11.9M.

Open comparison →

Omari Hutchinson

Nottingham Forest · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (78.92266387590132%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+11).

Open comparison →