Replacement finder

Replace Lee Kang-in

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Paris Saint-Germain would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

3

Assists

4

G+A

7

Shots

37

SoT

15

Crosses

113

Fouls won

19

Tackles won

9

Interceptions

1

Attack

59

Creation

76

Progression

56

Role score

64

Transfer fit

64

Filter:

Cheap alternative

St Pauli · Bundesliga · Creative Winger · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (90.65504307620466%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€16.1M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Arsenal · Premier League · Creative Winger · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (90.51642109447752%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Arijon Ibrahimović

Heidenheim · Bundesliga · Creative Winger · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (87.23278319143313%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€12.7M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Jean-Luc Dompé

Hamburger SV · Bundesliga · Creative Winger · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (86.80665085562842%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€15.7M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Mattéo Tramoni

Pisa · Serie A · Creative Winger · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (86.12464935164047%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-16); cheaper by ~€13.8M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Cristian Volpato

Sassuolo · Serie A · Creative Winger · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (86.73221424122352%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-18); cheaper by ~€9.3M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Víctor García

Levante · La Liga · Creative Winger · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (86.26859144884106%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-16); cheaper by ~€18.0M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Newcastle United · Premier League · Goal Threat Winger · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (86.35381756394948%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€5.2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Bazoumana Touré

Hoffenheim · Bundesliga · Creative Winger · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (86.3998442158545%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Fodé Doucouré

Le Havre · Ligue 1 · Creative Winger · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (83.80805715651687%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-13); cheaper by ~€17.1M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Chelsea · Premier League · Creative Winger · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (84.43368784304872%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Oviedo · La Liga · Creative Winger · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (84.52157743560312%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-17); cheaper by ~€14.9M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Metz · Ligue 1 · Creative Winger · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (84.07123840860478%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€13.8M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Paris FC · Ligue 1 · Creative Winger · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (84.950359884209%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-14); cheaper by ~€11.3M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Sevilla · La Liga · Creative Winger · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (82.88196881961892%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); cheaper by ~€7.9M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Matteo Politano

Napoli · Serie A · Creative Winger · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (84.986381187417%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€10.6M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · Creative Winger · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (81.09856682367902%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€300K.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Viktor Tsyhankov

Girona · La Liga · Creative Winger · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (82.0936825852344%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →