Replacement finder

Replace Kobbie Mainoo

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Manchester Utd would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

2

G+A

3

Shots

13

SoT

3

Crosses

13

Fouls won

22

Tackles won

20

Interceptions

19

Attack

30

Creation

42

Progression

50

Role score

45

Transfer fit

57

Filter:

Wonderkid regen

Ebenezer Akinsanmiro

Pisa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (84.4300153788356%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+15); cheaper by ~€45.8M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Sunderland · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (85.37995841364854%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€20M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Levante · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (89.16391863189911%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); cheaper by ~€50.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Sevilla · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (85.03724331431928%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€44.9M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Mateus Fernandes

West Ham United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (78.74063663202242%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+17); cheaper by ~€18M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Le Havre · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (79.87348569883075%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€49.2M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Benjamin André

Lille · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 35

Strong stylistic match (85.37696813397638%); tactical fit is workable; upgrade on role score (+21); cheaper by ~€47.9M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Alavés · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (82.18344715604532%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€42.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Ezequiél Fernández

Leverkusen · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (79.0240977645065%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+17); cheaper by ~€29M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Jessy Deminguet

Metz · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (84.0049150333707%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€49.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (81.69839930251902%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€49.7M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Leeds United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (80.98728569140027%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+11); cheaper by ~€29M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Samir El Mourabet

Strasbourg · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (78.96571235419586%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9); cheaper by ~€34.5M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Emirhan İlkhan

Torino · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (77.90883072426305%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); cheaper by ~€46.8M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Patrizio Masini

Genoa · Serie A · Defensive Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (79.38101208129824%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+19); cheaper by ~€45.7M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Brest · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (82.38617816047324%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€46.5M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Mamadou Coulibaly

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (77.78400552538808%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+16); cheaper by ~€37.9M.

Open comparison →

Moisés Caicedo

Chelsea · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (78.74622899220249%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+15).

Open comparison →