Replacement finder

Replace Kim Min-jae

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Bayern Munich would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

1

G+A

2

Shots

5

SoT

3

Crosses

1

Fouls won

3

Tackles won

19

Interceptions

38

Attack

0

Creation

0

Progression

65

Role score

86

Transfer fit

72

Filter:

Closest profile

Konstantinos Mavropanos

West Ham United · Premier League · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (89.24638658466122%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Villarreal · La Liga · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (87.14347873538358%); tactical fit is good; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (86.65834178662026%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-14).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Fulham · Premier League · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (88.71991613319499%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-17); cheaper by ~€5.4M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Atalanta · Serie A · Center Back · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (87.0506827727133%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€8.6M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Abdukodir Khusanov

Manchester City · Premier League · Center Back · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (88.24799326302593%); tactical fit is good; 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Andrias Edmundsson

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Center Back · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (86.28129809236997%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€11.4M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Athletic Club · La Liga · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (87.67419662319239%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-24); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Crystal Palace · Premier League · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (85.43675272695685%); tactical fit is good; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Manchester Utd · Premier League · Center Back · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (87.64169666054767%); tactical fit is good; 9 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Bayern Munich · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (86.56091677658065%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-29).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Jordan Torunarigha

Hamburger SV · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (83.83138375352452%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); cheaper by ~€9.9M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Sunderland · Premier League · Center Back · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (86.25390224779973%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-31).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Union Berlin · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (84.83684395784145%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-16); cheaper by ~€100K; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Le Havre · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (83.69249594466982%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); cheaper by ~€10.9M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Nottingham Forest · Premier League · Center Back · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (86.82405950432619%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-18); 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Angers · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (84.21630062202645%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9); cheaper by ~€12.8M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (82.97008591178992%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€6M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →