Replacement finder

Replace Julian Ryerson

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Dortmund would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

0

Assists

15

G+A

15

Shots

12

SoT

1

Crosses

250

Fouls won

21

Tackles won

21

Interceptions

12

Attack

52

Creation

89

Progression

59

Role score

61

Transfer fit

61

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (85.99255229684152%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€12.1M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Jari Vandeputte

Cremonese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (82.28070473813467%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+10); cheaper by ~€14.7M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Lorenzo Bernasconi

Atalanta · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (85.8251399143299%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€3.4M; 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Christopher Trimmel

Union Berlin · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 39

Strong stylistic match (87.73963739396214%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€18.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Espanyol · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (80.49448112840365%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+15); cheaper by ~€15.3M.

Open comparison →

Federico Dimarco

Inter · Serie A · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (78.98725894805001%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14).

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Emanuele Valeri

Parma · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (81.8634609017031%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€16M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Jonathan Clauss

Nice · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (81.60279199942808%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9); cheaper by ~€14.8M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Valentino Lazaro

Torino · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (82.8210871840295%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); cheaper by ~€15.1M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Brighton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 34

Strong stylistic match (83.64405287017145%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€15.7M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Daniel Svensson

Dortmund · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (82.08208455224332%); tactical fit is good; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Paris FC · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (80.86014106209029%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€13.7M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Domagoj Bradarić

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (81.89530726157638%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-14); cheaper by ~€16.2M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Getafe · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (79.09032983538845%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€15.7M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Dimitris Giannoulis

Augsburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (78.59355678498858%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€15.8M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Przemysław Frankowski

Rennes · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (78.78207979742022%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€11.3M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

David Møller Wolfe

Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (82.54433078791303%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-22); cheaper by ~€9.7M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Raoul Bellanova

Atalanta · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (80.32899794144545%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); cheaper by ~€1.4M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →