Replacement finder

Replace Johnny Cardoso

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Atlético Madrid would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

0

Assists

0

G+A

0

Shots

2

SoT

0

Crosses

3

Fouls won

14

Tackles won

21

Interceptions

16

Attack

25

Creation

36

Progression

47

Role score

40

Transfer fit

42

Filter:

Real Betis · La Liga · Defensive Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (84.4394939288595%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+12); cheaper by ~€1.7M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Morten Frendrup

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (86.18507516184447%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€3.8M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Wolfsburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (84.14791611256891%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€9.7M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Köln · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (79.50666100725442%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+12); cheaper by ~€17.3M.

Open comparison →

Soungoutou Magassa

West Ham United · Premier League · Defensive Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (79.10262537555536%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+10); cheaper by ~€2.6M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (75.20582697392861%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18).

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Nicolas Fonseca

Oviedo · La Liga · Defensive Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (76.93923870385407%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€18.1M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Jon Gorrotxategi

Real Sociedad · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (76.25930338230368%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Everton · Premier League · Defensive Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (75.88087001883083%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); cheaper by ~€5.5M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Óscar Valentín

Rayo Vallecano · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (78.26699920467571%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€18.9M.

Open comparison →

Moisés Caicedo

Chelsea · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Reasonable profile overlap (71.62156775132158%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+20).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Parma · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Reasonable profile overlap (74.34419308591214%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€4.7M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Auxerre · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (76.65140447229396%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€17.2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Nicolás González

Manchester City · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Reasonable profile overlap (73.11098786607165%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8).

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Ebenezer Akinsanmiro

Pisa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Reasonable profile overlap (72.36673843144476%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+20); cheaper by ~€14.8M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Patrizio Masini

Genoa · Serie A · Defensive Midfielder · Age 25

Reasonable profile overlap (69.5941341980915%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+24); cheaper by ~€14.7M.

Open comparison →

Samir El Mourabet

Strasbourg · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 20

Reasonable profile overlap (72.79921052375784%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); cheaper by ~€3.5M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Eduardo Camavinga

Real Madrid · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Reasonable profile overlap (69.63834780341482%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+23); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →