Replacement finder

Replace James Ward-Prowse

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What West Ham United would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

0

Assists

0

G+A

0

Shots

2

SoT

0

Crosses

22

Fouls won

2

Tackles won

2

Interceptions

6

Attack

42

Creation

72

Progression

35

Role score

25

Transfer fit

21

Filter:

Jonathan Clauss

Nice · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (88.36332290420172%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+45); cheaper by ~€1.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Getafe · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (83.60236493062692%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+41); cheaper by ~€2.2M.

Open comparison →

Valentino Lazaro

Torino · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (84.75508029504712%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+28); cheaper by ~€1.6M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Jari Vandeputte

Cremonese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (82.1682007563917%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+46); cheaper by ~€1.2M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Dimitris Giannoulis

Augsburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (82.6571651409017%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+39); cheaper by ~€2.3M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

David Møller Wolfe

Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (88.54095196484079%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Espanyol · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (80.17729786194677%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+51); cheaper by ~€1.8M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Brighton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 34

Strong stylistic match (82.09980499910971%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+35); cheaper by ~€2.2M.

Open comparison →

Osasuna · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (83.26733901169105%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+26); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Lens · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (81.36942801979067%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+33); cheaper by ~€2.1M.

Open comparison →

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (79.65125829457841%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+42); 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Federico Dimarco

Inter · Serie A · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (79.12531072415132%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+50); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Brentford · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (79.01357768379371%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+40); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (82.8431919359032%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+36); 8 years younger.

Open comparison →

Daniel Svensson

Dortmund · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (82.18479857203558%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+38); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Lorenzo Bernasconi

Atalanta · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (84.37277671508288%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+30); 9 years younger.

Open comparison →

Mallorca · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (79.16029298981852%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+36); cheaper by ~€2.1M.

Open comparison →

Arsenal · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (80.3278175737631%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+40); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →