Replacement finder

Replace Ismaila Sarr

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Crystal Palace would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

9

Assists

1

G+A

10

Shots

48

SoT

21

Crosses

24

Fouls won

42

Tackles won

9

Interceptions

7

Attack

73

Creation

38

Progression

67

Role score

50

Transfer fit

57

Filter:

Chelsea · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (81.40673561458829%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+13); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Strasbourg · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (81.06100178069158%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+17); cheaper by ~€14.5M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Athletic Club · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (80.3765961425488%); tactical fit is good; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Corentin Tolisso

Lyon · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (78.02805795268904%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+20); cheaper by ~€19.8M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Morgan Gibbs-White

Nottingham Forest · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (76.93808211810894%); tactical fit is good; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Paris FC · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Reasonable profile overlap (74.57042838729909%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€31.8M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Scott McTominay

Napoli · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Reasonable profile overlap (73.94823570502786%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Bologna · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Reasonable profile overlap (74.20889272651806%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€18.8M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Jude Bellingham

Real Madrid · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Reasonable profile overlap (74.30920133545462%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+21); 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Barcelona · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Reasonable profile overlap (69.87339711974022%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+25).

Open comparison →

Nicolás González

Atlético Madrid · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Reasonable profile overlap (70.61463742386472%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+15); cheaper by ~€8M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Grischa Prömel

Hoffenheim · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Reasonable profile overlap (71.67527896299768%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); cheaper by ~€29.4M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Jean-Victor Makengo

Lorient · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Reasonable profile overlap (72.49968724412024%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€27.4M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Bayern Munich · Bundesliga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 29

Reasonable profile overlap (68.80688263920118%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+21).

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Aston Villa · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Reasonable profile overlap (69.01672653911275%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+17); cheaper by ~€16.5M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Aston Villa · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Reasonable profile overlap (71.62913126608197%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Junior Dina Ebimbe

Brest · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Reasonable profile overlap (71.74181442203034%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€26.5M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Mauro Arambarri

Getafe · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Reasonable profile overlap (71.15803248134577%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€22.7M.

Open comparison →