Replacement finder

Replace Hiroki Ito

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Bayern Munich would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

2

G+A

3

Shots

10

SoT

3

Crosses

7

Fouls won

3

Tackles won

3

Interceptions

13

Attack

0

Creation

0

Progression

33

Role score

59

Transfer fit

50

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Sassuolo · Serie A · Center Back · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (89.39539553887025%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€9.4M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Burnley · Premier League · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (87.87089456578686%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€15.2M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Paris FC · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (85.20048416273008%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€17M.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Hamburger SV · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (83.1737296019177%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+22); cheaper by ~€16.4M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Metz · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (86.53861111583359%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€17M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Torbjørn Heggem

Bologna · Serie A · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (84.13474470658151%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€6.7M.

Open comparison →

Konstantinos Mavropanos

West Ham United · Premier League · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (81.67817274997277%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18); cheaper by ~€3.5M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Joško Gvardiol

Manchester City · Premier League · Center Back · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (85.01107513102775%); tactical fit is good; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Fiorentina · Serie A · Center Back · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (85.5497788677589%); tactical fit is good; 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (83.60023593728243%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€7.1M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Wolfsburg · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (85.92270162617999%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€13.3M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Manchester Utd · Premier League · Center Back · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (83.53053328097985%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+21); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Matthijs de Ligt

Manchester Utd · Premier League · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (81.79658058778227%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+10); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Juventus · Serie A · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (83.60156255714048%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€4.7M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Anthony Rouault

Rennes · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (85.87725118319082%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9); cheaper by ~€10.1M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Federico Baschirotto

Cremonese · Serie A · Center Back · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (85.88794215770554%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-13); cheaper by ~€15.9M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Athletic Club · La Liga · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (83.3577361971839%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€2.7M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Napoli · Serie A · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (83.23907728705866%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →