RebuildFC
Replacement finder

Replace Fikayo Tomori

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Milan would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals
0
Assists
2
G+A
2
Shots
9
SoT
2
Crosses
17
Fouls won
7
Tackles won
40
Interceptions
28
Attack
0
Creation
0
Progression
68
Role score
66
Transfer fit
62
Filter:
Cheap alternative
Mark McKenzie
Toulouse · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 27
85%
similarity
Tactical fit
79%
Role score
61
Estimated Fee
€6.3M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€12.2M
Upside Δ
+1

Strong stylistic match (84.82793688721527%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€12.2M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Closest profile
Daniel Vivian
Athletic Club · La Liga · Center Back · Age 26
84%
similarity
Tactical fit
77%
Role score
70
Estimated Fee
€23M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
+€4.5M
Upside Δ
+2

Strong stylistic match (83.55662759893633%); tactical fit is good; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Closest profile
Moritz Jenz
Wolfsburg · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 27
85%
similarity
Tactical fit
79%
Role score
52
Estimated Fee
€4.7M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€13.8M
Upside Δ
+1

Strong stylistic match (85.22959470323462%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-14); cheaper by ~€13.8M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Top-class replacement
Zaid Romero
Getafe · La Liga · Center Back · Age 26
81%
similarity
Tactical fit
76%
Role score
84
Estimated Fee
€2.4M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€16.1M
Upside Δ
+2

Strong stylistic match (80.87555360152213%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18); cheaper by ~€16.1M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Top-class replacement
Antonio Caracciolo
Pisa · Serie A · Center Back · Age 35
82%
similarity
Tactical fit
72%
Role score
78
Estimated Fee
€755K
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€17.7M
Upside Δ
-7

Strong stylistic match (82.3269918097811%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+12); cheaper by ~€17.7M.

Open comparison →
View profile
Cheap alternative
David Carmo
Oviedo · La Liga · Center Back · Age 26
82%
similarity
Tactical fit
77%
Role score
59
Estimated Fee
€9.2M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€9.3M
Upside Δ
+2

Strong stylistic match (82.09405747526485%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€9.3M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Upgrade option
Gerard Martín
Barcelona · La Liga · Center Back · Age 24
80%
similarity
Tactical fit
74%
Role score
77
Estimated Fee
€18.2M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€300K
Upside Δ
+4

Strong stylistic match (79.81210454225686%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+11); cheaper by ~€300K; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Top-class replacement
Amos Pieper
Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 28
76%
similarity
Tactical fit
77%
Role score
84
Estimated Fee
€3.9M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€14.6M
Upside Δ
+0

Strong stylistic match (76.27063892834016%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18); cheaper by ~€14.6M.

Open comparison →
View profile
Wonderkid regen
Sadibou Sané
Metz · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 21
80%
similarity
Tactical fit
71%
Role score
83
Estimated Fee
€3.9M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€14.6M
Upside Δ
+7

Strong stylistic match (79.50931985968641%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+17); cheaper by ~€14.6M; 7 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Top-class replacement
Stefan Posch
Mainz 05 · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 29
77%
similarity
Tactical fit
76%
Role score
81
Estimated Fee
€5.7M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€12.8M
Upside Δ
-1

Strong stylistic match (76.75937007918037%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+15); cheaper by ~€12.8M.

Open comparison →
View profile
Closest profile
Maxence Lacroix
Crystal Palace · Premier League · Center Back · Age 26
78%
similarity
Tactical fit
75%
Role score
75
Estimated Fee
€43M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
+€24.5M
Upside Δ
+2

Strong stylistic match (78.31311523431626%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9); 2 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Wonderkid regen
Jorrel Hato
Chelsea · Premier League · Center Back · Age 20
81%
similarity
Tactical fit
70%
Role score
74
Estimated Fee
€36M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
+€17.5M
Upside Δ
+8

Strong stylistic match (80.68818105519101%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); 8 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Closest profile
Joachim Andersen
Fulham · Premier League · Center Back · Age 29
79%
similarity
Tactical fit
77%
Role score
59
Estimated Fee
€26M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
+€7.5M
Upside Δ
-1

Strong stylistic match (79.4078211040726%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →
View profile
Closest profile
Jean-Clair Todibo
West Ham United · Premier League · Center Back · Age 26
79%
similarity
Tactical fit
75%
Role score
65
Estimated Fee
€25M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
+€6.5M
Upside Δ
+2

Strong stylistic match (78.63058871210163%); tactical fit is good; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Top-class replacement
Malang Sarr
Lens · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 27
74%
similarity
Tactical fit
75%
Role score
89
Estimated Fee
€10.6M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€7.9M
Upside Δ
+1

Reasonable profile overlap (74.05668603698463%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+23); cheaper by ~€7.9M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Closest profile
Arthur Theate
Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 26
77%
similarity
Tactical fit
75%
Role score
70
Estimated Fee
€23M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
+€4.5M
Upside Δ
+2

Strong stylistic match (77.48082310066698%); tactical fit is good; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →
View profile
Cheap alternative
Bernardo
Hoffenheim · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 31
76%
similarity
Tactical fit
74%
Role score
77
Estimated Fee
€4.6M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€13.9M
Upside Δ
-3

Strong stylistic match (76.43911270958597%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+11); cheaper by ~€13.9M.

Open comparison →
View profile
Cheap alternative
Keven Schlotterbeck
Augsburg · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 29
76%
similarity
Tactical fit
75%
Role score
73
Estimated Fee
€5.7M
Sample
high
Fee Δ
-€12.8M
Upside Δ
-1

Strong stylistic match (75.74588148730388%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€12.8M.

Open comparison →
View profile