Replacement finder

Replace Federico Chiesa

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Liverpool would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

2

Assists

1

G+A

3

Shots

17

SoT

5

Crosses

17

Fouls won

7

Tackles won

5

Interceptions

4

Attack

89

Creation

78

Progression

68

Role score

38

Transfer fit

29

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Ruslan Malinovskyi

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (86.3133636983565%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+23); cheaper by ~€11.1M.

Open comparison →

Marseille · Ligue 1 · Attacking Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (84.45506569996076%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+27); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Tijjani Reijnders

Manchester City · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (84.43812566509277%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+18); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Udinese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (85.20477577390238%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+17); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Fulham · Premier League · Attacking Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (81.39698420105054%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+28).

Open comparison →

Bournemouth · Premier League · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (80.13908040717101%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+31); cheaper by ~€900K.

Open comparison →

Mason Greenwood

Marseille · Ligue 1 · Attacking Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (80.54478070919909%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+31); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Athletic Club · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (83.6246713958317%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); cheaper by ~€8.5M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Aleksandr Golovin

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Attacking Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (79.87028902783767%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+23).

Open comparison →

Nicolás González

Atlético Madrid · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (78.70380777188954%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+27).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Denzel Dumfries

Inter · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (81.71823651730472%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9).

Open comparison →

Marcus Tavernier

Bournemouth · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (78.66305762758574%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+28); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Gonçalo Guedes

Real Sociedad · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (78.28511968179328%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+27); cheaper by ~€8M.

Open comparison →

Rolando Mandragora

Fiorentina · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (76.52466818238099%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+28); cheaper by ~€4.2M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Rayo Vallecano · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (80.89758125977716%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€10.8M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Leverkusen · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 20

Strong stylistic match (78.94447037328203%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+40); 8 years younger.

Open comparison →

Kamaldeen Sulemana

Atalanta · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (79.0233595137633%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+22); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Henrikh Mkhitaryan

Inter · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 37

Strong stylistic match (79.56320547067332%); tactical fit is workable; upgrade on role score (+33); cheaper by ~€10.3M.

Open comparison →