Replacement finder

Replace Edu Expósito

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Espanyol would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

6

G+A

7

Shots

44

SoT

13

Crosses

254

Fouls won

42

Tackles won

29

Interceptions

24

Attack

72

Creation

92

Progression

79

Role score

76

Transfer fit

76

Filter:

Closest profile

Jari Vandeputte

Cremonese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (90.16268938135082%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Álex Berenguer

Athletic Club · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (88.66099376622374%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Omari Hutchinson

Nottingham Forest · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (91.52772536432721%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Mallorca · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (89.62381928796715%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-15); cheaper by ~€300K.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Alavés · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (90.60413169723037%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); cheaper by ~€2.7M; 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Raoul Bellanova

Atalanta · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (90.62146499805141%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-26); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Federico Dimarco

Inter · Serie A · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (85.60746892601388%); tactical fit is good; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Heorhii Tsitaishvili

Metz · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (89.28566504457392%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-14); cheaper by ~€1.3M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Getafe · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (86.97168376283375%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€400K.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Brighton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 34

Strong stylistic match (88.83890715576736%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-16); cheaper by ~€400K.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Branco van den Boomen

Angers · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (87.8690334844511%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-23); cheaper by ~€1.2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Union Berlin · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (86.50649843546583%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-15); 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (84.2411415894412%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Joaquín Martínez Gauna

Sevilla · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (87.0091705835281%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Brentford · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (83.64111240797988%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11).

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Valencia · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (85.13036994796585%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-13); cheaper by ~€1.5M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Emanuele Valeri

Parma · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (85.06309956843047%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-18); cheaper by ~€700K; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Leverkusen · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (83.96723240117747%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-16); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →