Replacement finder

Replace Dayot Upamecano

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Bayern Munich would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

1

G+A

2

Shots

8

SoT

2

Crosses

7

Fouls won

5

Tackles won

26

Interceptions

21

Attack

0

Creation

0

Progression

66

Role score

73

Transfer fit

65

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Köln · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (92.20166406542836%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€61.9M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Leverkusen · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (89.87513100258177%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€41M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Crystal Palace · Premier League · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (88.70688764213165%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€42M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Metz · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 34

Strong stylistic match (91.20256784621523%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+12); cheaper by ~€64.7M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Paris Saint-Germain · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (89.404766837411%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Villarreal · La Liga · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (87.57091807819047%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); cheaper by ~€48.9M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Dortmund · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (89.1298341528786%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€45.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Wolves · Premier League · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (88.97167277765764%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); cheaper by ~€55.8M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Newcastle United · Premier League · Center Back · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (90.19524189805679%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€24M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Angers · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (88.9951151031574%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€60.9M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Paris FC · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (87.04009459617356%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€59.5M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Union Berlin · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (87.41122848382518%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€51.1M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Nottingham Forest · Premier League · Center Back · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (89.22883121672949%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€16M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Barcelona · La Liga · Center Back · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (86.93924561505457%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€46.8M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Atalanta · Serie A · Center Back · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (87.7139652894028%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€59.6M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

St Pauli · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (88.27195048198486%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€63.5M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Kristoffer Ajer

Brentford · Premier League · Center Back · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (87.71233356554966%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); cheaper by ~€45.5M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Oviedo · La Liga · Center Back · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (88.04418312564871%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€63.5M.

Open comparison →