Replace Dani Olmo

Strong stylistic match (85.8706619962161%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); cheaper by ~€54.4M.

Strong stylistic match (80.94838088054976%); tactical fit is good.

Strong stylistic match (83.949076154512%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€14M; 8 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (83.9463801590543%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-17); cheaper by ~€25M; 6 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (79.8663610750827%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€33M.

Strong stylistic match (81.01833061213625%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-15); cheaper by ~€43.6M.

Strong stylistic match (81.7022898996716%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-21); cheaper by ~€46.4M.

Strong stylistic match (81.50324638822565%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-16); 5 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (82.65434121779306%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-20); 7 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (79.00027613781792%); tactical fit is good; 5 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (77.85005100505427%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9); cheaper by ~€55.9M; 2 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (79.66028557649932%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-13); 5 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (79.08252832512113%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); cheaper by ~€9M; 5 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (80.5583735600728%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€32M; 8 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (78.30623280981337%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-21); cheaper by ~€31M; 1 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (77.76625587263032%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); 4 years younger.

Strong stylistic match (77.98398686178199%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-21); cheaper by ~€24M; 2 years younger.

Reasonable profile overlap (74.70327948215066%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); cheaper by ~€41.9M.