Replacement finder

Replace Conor Gallagher

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Tottenham Hotspur would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

1

G+A

2

Shots

11

SoT

4

Crosses

23

Fouls won

23

Tackles won

14

Interceptions

18

Attack

50

Creation

51

Progression

64

Role score

57

Transfer fit

59

Filter:

Closest profile

Sergio Carreira

Celta Vigo · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (88.66233963277506%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); cheaper by ~€28.3M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Lorient · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (86.75942567869288%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€13M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Espanyol · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (85.27878532664128%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); cheaper by ~€28.2M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Bologna · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (83.8704906496532%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€17.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Michel Aebischer

Pisa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (83.67332757068891%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€29.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (82.17080599555285%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€31.7M.

Open comparison →

Alexis Saelemaekers

Milan · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (78.51793904591285%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+17); cheaper by ~€8M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Villarreal · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (80.67663157599542%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€21M.

Open comparison →

Gladbach · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (79.80272103931367%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+17); cheaper by ~€12M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Espanyol · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (79.70383032116496%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9); cheaper by ~€30.8M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Wolfsburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (79.79618744262199%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); cheaper by ~€20.1M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Arkadiusz Pyrka

St Pauli · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (82.51261060241774%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9); cheaper by ~€31.1M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Manchester Utd · Premier League · Attacking Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (79.34778240061142%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+15); cheaper by ~€1M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Bournemouth · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (79.49972231500378%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+11); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Oviedo · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (79.05616850895017%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€32.6M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Jessy Deminguet

Metz · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (81.39660708794304%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-13); cheaper by ~€31.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Sevilla · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (80.34159186907664%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€26.9M.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Bruno Guimarães

Newcastle United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Reasonable profile overlap (74.63071599103183%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+22).

Open comparison →