Replacement finder

Replace Christopher Trimmel

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Union Berlin would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

0

Assists

3

G+A

3

Shots

5

SoT

1

Crosses

177

Fouls won

9

Tackles won

24

Interceptions

10

Attack

45

Creation

83

Progression

47

Role score

57

Transfer fit

57

Filter:

Closest profile

Dortmund · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (87.73963739396214%); tactical fit is good; 11 years younger.

Open comparison →

Genoa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (86.423101993631%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+10); 10 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Valentino Lazaro

Torino · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (86.71460391810952%); tactical fit is good; 9 years younger.

Open comparison →

Jonathan Clauss

Nice · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (82.86554659134738%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+13); 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Brighton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 34

Strong stylistic match (82.80270208879557%); tactical fit is good; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Lorenzo Bernasconi

Atalanta · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (88.54122182281618%); tactical fit is workable; 17 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Emanuele Valeri

Parma · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (84.57052578554605%); tactical fit is workable; 12 years younger.

Open comparison →

Jari Vandeputte

Cremonese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (81.46669916571986%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); 9 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Przemysław Frankowski

Rennes · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (80.80492034822315%); tactical fit is good; 8 years younger.

Open comparison →

Espanyol · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (78.56995598824899%); tactical fit is workable; upgrade on role score (+19); 10 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Oviedo · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 41

Strong stylistic match (75.55062174023683%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+10); cheaper by ~€360K.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Domagoj Bradarić

Hellas Verona · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (84.46328358066344%); tactical fit is workable; weaker role score (-10); 13 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Jackson Tchatchoua

Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (85.0177828292218%); tactical fit is workable; weaker role score (-15); 15 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Getafe · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (78.41824022831003%); tactical fit is workable; upgrade on role score (+9); 8 years younger.

Open comparison →

Federico Dimarco

Inter · Serie A · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (76.95646386638862%); tactical fit is workable; upgrade on role score (+18); 11 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Marcus Pedersen

Torino · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (82.74685624523073%); tactical fit is workable; weaker role score (-15); 14 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Dimitris Giannoulis

Augsburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (77.09816607941387%); tactical fit is workable; 9 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Branco van den Boomen

Angers · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (78.50107367338902%); tactical fit is workable; 9 years younger.

Open comparison →