Replacement finder

Replace Chris Wood

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Nottingham Forest would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

3

Assists

0

G+A

3

Shots

23

SoT

9

Crosses

1

Fouls won

6

Tackles won

1

Interceptions

1

Attack

75

Creation

20

Progression

21

Role score

48

Transfer fit

46

Filter:

Closest profile

Everton · Premier League · Goal Threat Winger · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (90.52468522932818%); tactical fit is good; 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Brighton · Premier League · Goal Threat Winger · Age 35

Strong stylistic match (84.69073687240751%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€2.1M.

Open comparison →

Dominic Calvert-Lewin

Leeds United · Premier League · Goal Threat Winger · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (84.14125708063226%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+14); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Bayern Munich · Bundesliga · Striker · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (80.166633569942%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+28); 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Manchester City · Premier League · Striker · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (84.87963388889541%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+17); 9 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Everton · Premier League · Inside Forward · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (88.65648456455237%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); 11 years younger.

Open comparison →

Brentford · Premier League · Goal Threat Winger · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (83.94758272160011%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+13); 10 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Budu Zivzivadze

Heidenheim · Bundesliga · Goal Threat Winger · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (80.50260886731786%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+8); cheaper by ~€5M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Stuttgart · Bundesliga · Striker · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (78.83038930614237%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+23); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Köln · Bundesliga · Inside Forward · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (81.31803500467471%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+15); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Celta Vigo · La Liga · Inside Forward · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (77.99044417972272%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+16); cheaper by ~€3.2M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Nikola Krstović

Atalanta · Serie A · Striker · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (79.90770405206148%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+21); 8 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Christian Kofane

Leverkusen · Bundesliga · Striker · Age 19

Strong stylistic match (84.02796646593882%); tactical fit is workable; upgrade on role score (+14); 15 years younger.

Open comparison →

Viktor Gyökeres

Arsenal · Premier League · Goal Threat Winger · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (80.16262649357267%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+11); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Lautaro Martínez

Inter · Serie A · Striker · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (77.30080722427151%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+26); 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Leeds United · Premier League · Goal Threat Winger · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (78.22639893449185%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+21); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang

Marseille · Ligue 1 · Creative Winger · Age 36

Reasonable profile overlap (74.87152747645945%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+23); cheaper by ~€3.4M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Le Havre · Ligue 1 · Goal Threat Winger · Age 33

Strong stylistic match (75.994516020029%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€5.4M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →