Replacement finder

Replace Anton Stach

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Leeds United would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

5

Assists

3

G+A

8

Shots

55

SoT

14

Crosses

155

Fouls won

24

Tackles won

35

Interceptions

19

Attack

72

Creation

79

Progression

61

Role score

69

Transfer fit

73

Filter:

Closest profile

Dominik Szoboszlai

Liverpool · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (90.68009906301447%); tactical fit is good; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Alavés · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (84.39578201155062%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+10); cheaper by ~€22.5M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Valencia · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (86.64901894788554%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-15); cheaper by ~€18.3M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Union Berlin · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (86.14500129651825%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); cheaper by ~€19.8M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Valencia · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (88.27588671223359%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€21.9M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (86.48417489697856%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€9.5M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Brighton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (87.09808966162603%); tactical fit is good; 6 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Lazar Samardzic

Atalanta · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (84.81560634803326%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€9.4M; 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Mainz 05 · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (85.46416698299073%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€9.7M; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Pablo Martínez

Levante · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (85.34752047030717%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); cheaper by ~€21.9M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Real Betis · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (84.24469528925458%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€15.6M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Callum Hudson-Odoi

Nottingham Forest · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (85.4230217138725%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-15); 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Toulouse · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (80.94778770031297%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+10); cheaper by ~€18.6M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Rayo Vallecano · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (86.30011725795768%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-19); cheaper by ~€22.6M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Federico Dimarco

Inter · Serie A · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (81.21402271538516%); tactical fit is good.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (80.82080308805685%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€1M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Álex Berenguer

Athletic Club · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (81.36078871688785%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€18.8M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Justin Kluivert

Bournemouth · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (81.6823204103651%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10).

Open comparison →