Replacement finder

Replace Adrien Thomasson

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Lens would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

3

Assists

9

G+A

12

Shots

43

SoT

13

Crosses

121

Fouls won

43

Tackles won

56

Interceptions

20

Attack

91

Creation

86

Progression

75

Role score

81

Transfer fit

81

Filter:

Closest profile

Gladbach · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (83.82767882778631%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€1.7M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Manchester City · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (84.19206060026482%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-28); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Alexander Prass

Hoffenheim · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (84.63828188630002%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); 8 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Fulham · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (82.51932490313564%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-15); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Toulouse · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (81.00052598005323%); tactical fit is good; 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Nice · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (85.15648744408693%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-15); 9 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Mikkel Damsgaard

Brentford · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (82.98239182804235%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-8); 7 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Nicolò Barella

Inter · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (81.50720633682266%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-17); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall

Everton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (82.01081103902553%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Leeds United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (81.25071707509153%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-9); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Jan-Niklas Beste

Freiburg · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (80.13474263085446%); tactical fit is good; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (81.33250677936317%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-10); 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Cremonese · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (83.08923783098797%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-25); cheaper by ~€2.4M; 5 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Espanyol · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (82.23932922706898%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-11); 8 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Girona · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 30

Strong stylistic match (80.37990926329827%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-19); cheaper by ~€2.7M; 2 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Real Sociedad · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 29

Strong stylistic match (81.15979080197633%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-24); 3 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Como · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (81.65681719723595%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-17); 8 years younger.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Pisa · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (80.68013606708496%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-23); 4 years younger.

Open comparison →