Replacement finder

Replace Adam Wharton

Statistically similar 2025/26 players based on per-90 output, defensive activity, role group and tactical fit. Estimated fees are not official market values — model-derived estimates from public football data.

What Crystal Palace would lose

Profile being replaced — public football data, model-derived role scores.

Goals

1

Assists

5

G+A

6

Shots

32

SoT

6

Crosses

86

Fouls won

31

Tackles won

36

Interceptions

27

Attack

60

Creation

82

Progression

62

Role score

68

Transfer fit

74

Filter:

Cheap alternative

Alexander Prass

Hoffenheim · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (84.14109446268644%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€56.2M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Mikkel Damsgaard

Brentford · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25

Strong stylistic match (83.4254188022435%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€34M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Ander Barrenetxea

Real Sociedad · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (81.75228008316633%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€45.8M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Strasbourg · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (82.21552378732538%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€39M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 22

Strong stylistic match (78.19955749429194%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+16); cheaper by ~€32M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Elche · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (83.1141427697587%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-18); cheaper by ~€58.2M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Manchester City · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 31

Strong stylistic match (85.50431714787088%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-15); cheaper by ~€37M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Lyon · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (81.17404928519142%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-12); cheaper by ~€44.3M.

Open comparison →

Closest profile

Pervis Estupiñán

Milan · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (83.79686906635598%); tactical fit is good; weaker role score (-21); cheaper by ~€50.1M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Real Madrid · La Liga · Attacking Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (77.05276345450068%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+9); 1 years younger.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (80.00495147017595%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€40M.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Toulouse · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 28

Strong stylistic match (78.91555834718125%); tactical fit is good; upgrade on role score (+11); cheaper by ~€57.6M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Saud Abdulhamid

Lens · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 26

Strong stylistic match (80.53161871323012%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€58.4M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Dortmund · Bundesliga · Central Midfielder · Age 23

Strong stylistic match (78.03737501410697%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€42M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 27

Strong stylistic match (79.52726445253057%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€57.2M.

Open comparison →

Top-class replacement

Adrien Thomasson

Lens · Ligue 1 · Central Midfielder · Age 32

Strong stylistic match (80.86202221505323%); tactical fit is workable; upgrade on role score (+13); cheaper by ~€58.2M.

Open comparison →

Cheap alternative

Espanyol · La Liga · Central Midfielder · Age 24

Strong stylistic match (77.55103864015689%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€52.2M.

Open comparison →

Wonderkid regen

Kassoum Ouattara

Monaco · Ligue 1 · Defensive Midfielder · Age 21

Strong stylistic match (77.24668496583801%); tactical fit is good; cheaper by ~€51.4M; 1 years younger.

Open comparison →