RebuildFC
Compare

Player Comparison

Choose two players for a side-by-side comparison: stats, radar overlay, category winners and a concise scouting recommendation. Estimated fees are model-derived, not official market values.

Player A
Wataru Endo
Liverpool · Premier League · Fullback · Age 33
Player B
Kyle Walker-Peters
West Ham United · Premier League · Fullback · Age 29

Radar overlay

DefensiveactivityInterceptionsWidedeliveryCreative output(xA/90)PressresistanceAvailability
Wataru EndoKyle Walker-Peters
MetricWataru EndoKyle Walker-Peters
Age↓ better3329
PositionDFDF
RoleFullbackFullback
Radar groupFBFB
Minutes1751383
SampleLowHigh
Goals01
Assists10
G+A11
Shots15
Shots on Target03
SoT %0.060.0
Crosses320
Fouls drawn325
Fouls committed↓ better212
Tackles won330
Interceptions09
Yellow cards↓ better12
Attack impact2828
Chance creation3634
Ball progression5561
Defensive impact4159
Role score2049
Transfer fit1853
Availability645
Estimated Fee€4.6M€12.1M
Attack
Kyle Walker-Peters
Creation
Wataru Endo
Progression
Kyle Walker-Peters
Defensive activity
Kyle Walker-Peters
Value
Wataru Endo
Overall fit
Kyle Walker-Peters

Scouting recommendation

Kyle Walker-Peters is a clear upgrade on role score (+29). Costs ~€7.5M more. Kyle Walker-Peters is 4 years younger — more resale runway. Kyle Walker-Peters wins attack; Wataru Endo wins creation; Kyle Walker-Peters wins progression; Kyle Walker-Peters wins defensive activity.