Compare
Player Comparison
Choose two players for a side-by-side comparison: stats, radar overlay, category winners and a concise scouting recommendation. Estimated fees are model-derived, not official market values.
Player A
Tom Edozie
Wolves · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 20
Player B
Cole Palmer
Chelsea · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 24
Radar overlay
Tom EdozieCole Palmer
| Metric | Tom Edozie | Cole Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Age↓ better | 20 | 24 |
| Position | MF | MF |
| Role | Central Midfielder | Central Midfielder |
| Radar group | CM | CM |
| Minutes | 14 | 1955 |
| Sample | Low | High |
| Goals | 1 | 10 |
| Assists | 0 | 1 |
| G+A | 1 | 11 |
| Shots | 2 | 64 |
| Shots on Target | 1 | 25 |
| SoT % | 50.0 | 39.1 |
| Crosses | 0 | 35 |
| Fouls drawn | 0 | 37 |
| Fouls committed↓ better | 0 | 13 |
| Tackles won | 0 | 12 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 13 |
| Yellow cards↓ better | 0 | 5 |
| Attack impact | 70 | 87 |
| Chance creation | 11 | 64 |
| Ball progression | 5 | 67 |
| Defensive impact | 7 | 28 |
| Role score | 12 | 63 |
| Transfer fit | 13 | 62 |
| Availability | 0 | 64 |
| Estimated Fee | €600K | €101M |
Attack
Cole Palmer
Creation
Cole Palmer
Progression
Cole Palmer
Defensive activity
Cole Palmer
Value
Tom Edozie
Overall fit
Cole Palmer
Scouting recommendation
Cole Palmer is a clear upgrade on role score (+51). Costs ~€100.4M more. Cole Palmer is 4 years older — limited resale ceiling. Cole Palmer wins attack; Cole Palmer wins creation; Cole Palmer wins progression; Cole Palmer wins defensive activity.