RebuildFC
Compare

Player Comparison

Choose two players for a side-by-side comparison: stats, radar overlay, category winners and a concise scouting recommendation. Estimated fees are model-derived, not official market values.

Player A
Romano Schmid
Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · Creative Winger · Age 26
Player B
Pedro Neto
Chelsea · Premier League · Creative Winger · Age 26

Radar overlay

Shot threat(xG/90)ShotvolumeCreative output(xA/90)WidedeliveryPressresistanceFinishingefficiencyAvailability
Romano SchmidPedro Neto
MetricRomano SchmidPedro Neto
Age↓ better2626
PositionMF,FWMF,FW
RoleCreative WingerCreative Winger
Radar groupFWFW
Minutes29822631
SampleHighHigh
Goals45
Assists86
G+A1211
Shots5746
Shots on Target2113
SoT %36.828.3
Crosses154184
Fouls drawn3125
Fouls committed↓ better1917
Tackles won2811
Interceptions136
Yellow cards↓ better44
Attack impact5235
Chance creation8080
Ball progression5957
Defensive impact2724
Role score6253
Transfer fit7365
Availability9786
Estimated Fee€18.7M€58M
Attack
Romano Schmid
Creation
Even
Progression
Romano Schmid
Defensive activity
Romano Schmid
Value
Romano Schmid
Overall fit
Romano Schmid

Scouting recommendation

Pedro Neto is a step down on role score (-9). Costs ~€39.3M more. Similar ages. Romano Schmid wins attack; Romano Schmid wins progression; Romano Schmid wins defensive activity.