RebuildFC
Compare

Player Comparison

Choose two players for a side-by-side comparison: stats, radar overlay, category winners and a concise scouting recommendation. Estimated fees are model-derived, not official market values.

Player A
Nicolas Cozza
Nantes · Ligue 1 · Center Back · Age 27
Player B
Kyle Walker-Peters
West Ham United · Premier League · Fullback · Age 29

Radar overlay

DefensiveactivityInterceptionsWidedeliveryCreative output(xA/90)PressresistanceAvailability
Nicolas CozzaKyle Walker-Peters
MetricNicolas CozzaKyle Walker-Peters
Age↓ better2729
PositionDFDF
RoleCenter BackFullback
Radar groupFBFB
Minutes23011383
SampleHighHigh
Goals01
Assists10
G+A11
Shots115
Shots on Target33
SoT %27.360.0
Crosses2220
Fouls drawn3125
Fouls committed↓ better2312
Tackles won2730
Interceptions219
Yellow cards↓ better22
Attack impact2128
Chance creation2434
Ball progression5561
Defensive impact4559
Role score3849
Transfer fit5753
Availability7545
Estimated Fee€3.2M€12.1M
Attack
Kyle Walker-Peters
Creation
Nicolas Cozza
Progression
Even
Defensive activity
Kyle Walker-Peters
Value
Nicolas Cozza
Overall fit
Kyle Walker-Peters

Scouting recommendation

Kyle Walker-Peters is a clear upgrade on role score (+11). Costs ~€8.9M more. Similar ages. Kyle Walker-Peters wins attack; Nicolas Cozza wins creation; Kyle Walker-Peters wins defensive activity.