Compare
Player Comparison
Choose two players for a side-by-side comparison: stats, radar overlay, category winners and a concise scouting recommendation. Estimated fees are model-derived, not official market values.
Player A
Nathaniel Clyne
Crystal Palace · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 35
Player B
James Garner
Everton · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 25
Radar overlay
Nathaniel ClyneJames Garner
| Metric | Nathaniel Clyne | James Garner |
|---|---|---|
| Age↓ better | 35 | 25 |
| Position | MF,DF | MF,DF |
| Role | Central Midfielder | Central Midfielder |
| Radar group | CM | CM |
| Minutes | 594 | 3413 |
| Sample | Medium | High |
| Goals | 0 | 2 |
| Assists | 1 | 7 |
| G+A | 1 | 9 |
| Shots | 3 | 45 |
| Shots on Target | 0 | 14 |
| SoT % | 0.0 | 31.1 |
| Crosses | 15 | 205 |
| Fouls drawn | 2 | 42 |
| Fouls committed↓ better | 4 | 39 |
| Tackles won | 9 | 72 |
| Interceptions | 7 | 57 |
| Yellow cards↓ better | 1 | 12 |
| Attack impact | 59 | 56 |
| Chance creation | 57 | 75 |
| Ball progression | 27 | 71 |
| Defensive impact | 72 | 90 |
| Role score | 45 | 72 |
| Transfer fit | 42 | 81 |
| Availability | 19 | 100 |
| Estimated Fee | €465K | €37M |
Attack
James Garner
Creation
James Garner
Progression
James Garner
Defensive activity
James Garner
Value
Nathaniel Clyne
Overall fit
James Garner
Scouting recommendation
James Garner is a clear upgrade on role score (+27). Costs ~€36.5M more. James Garner is 10 years younger — more resale runway. James Garner wins attack; James Garner wins creation; James Garner wins progression; James Garner wins defensive activity.