RebuildFC
Compare

Player Comparison

Choose two players for a side-by-side comparison: stats, radar overlay, category winners and a concise scouting recommendation. Estimated fees are model-derived, not official market values.

Player A
John Stones
Manchester City · Premier League · Center Back · Age 31
Player B
Aaron Wan-Bissaka
West Ham United · Premier League · Fullback · Age 28

Radar overlay

DefensiveactivityInterceptionsWidedeliveryCreative output(xA/90)PressresistanceAvailability
John StonesAaron Wan-Bissaka
MetricJohn StonesAaron Wan-Bissaka
Age↓ better3128
PositionDFDF,MF
RoleCenter BackFullback
Radar groupFBFB
Minutes4392081
SampleLowHigh
Goals00
Assists02
G+A02
Shots00
Shots on Target00
SoT %0.00.0
Crosses443
Fouls drawn012
Fouls committed↓ better023
Tackles won124
Interceptions341
Yellow cards↓ better04
Attack impact1340
Chance creation1240
Ball progression942
Defensive impact1666
Role score651
Transfer fit1760
Availability1468
Estimated Fee€13.6M€21M
Attack
Aaron Wan-Bissaka
Creation
Aaron Wan-Bissaka
Progression
Aaron Wan-Bissaka
Defensive activity
Aaron Wan-Bissaka
Value
John Stones
Overall fit
Aaron Wan-Bissaka

Scouting recommendation

Aaron Wan-Bissaka is a clear upgrade on role score (+45). Costs ~€7.4M more. Aaron Wan-Bissaka is 3 years younger — more resale runway. Aaron Wan-Bissaka wins attack; Aaron Wan-Bissaka wins creation; Aaron Wan-Bissaka wins progression; Aaron Wan-Bissaka wins defensive activity.