RebuildFC
Compare

Player Comparison

Choose two players for a side-by-side comparison: stats, radar overlay, category winners and a concise scouting recommendation. Estimated fees are model-derived, not official market values.

Player A
James Ward-Prowse
West Ham United · Premier League · Central Midfielder · Age 31
Player B
Federico Dimarco
Inter · Serie A · Attacking Midfielder · Age 28

Radar overlay

Creative output(xA/90)Shot threat(xG/90)DefensiveactivityInterceptionsWidedeliveryPressresistanceAvailability
James Ward-ProwseFederico Dimarco
MetricJames Ward-ProwseFederico Dimarco
Age↓ better3128
PositionMFMF
RoleCentral MidfielderAttacking Midfielder
Radar groupCMCM
Minutes4132698
SampleLowHigh
Goals07
Assists016
G+A023
Shots265
Shots on Target022
SoT %0.033.8
Crosses22295
Fouls drawn223
Fouls committed↓ better441
Tackles won231
Interceptions630
Yellow cards↓ better03
Attack impact4287
Chance creation7288
Ball progression3559
Defensive impact4758
Role score2575
Transfer fit2176
Availability1388
Estimated Fee€5.4M€48M
Attack
Federico Dimarco
Creation
Federico Dimarco
Progression
Federico Dimarco
Defensive activity
Federico Dimarco
Value
James Ward-Prowse
Overall fit
Federico Dimarco

Scouting recommendation

Federico Dimarco is a clear upgrade on role score (+50). Costs ~€42.6M more. Federico Dimarco is 3 years younger — more resale runway. Federico Dimarco wins attack; Federico Dimarco wins creation; Federico Dimarco wins progression; Federico Dimarco wins defensive activity.