RebuildFC
Compare

Player Comparison

Choose two players for a side-by-side comparison: stats, radar overlay, category winners and a concise scouting recommendation. Estimated fees are model-derived, not official market values.

Player A
Fabio Chiarodia
Gladbach · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 20
Player B
Kim Min-jae
Bayern Munich · Bundesliga · Center Back · Age 29

Radar overlay

DefensiveactivityInterceptionsFouldisciplineCarddisciplineAvailability
Fabio ChiarodiaKim Min-jae
MetricFabio ChiarodiaKim Min-jae
Age↓ better2029
PositionDFDF
RoleCenter BackCenter Back
Radar groupCBCB
Minutes6741602
SampleMediumHigh
Goals01
Assists01
G+A02
Shots45
Shots on Target13
SoT %25.060.0
Crosses01
Fouls drawn13
Fouls committed↓ better89
Tackles won919
Interceptions1338
Yellow cards↓ better11
Attack impact00
Chance creation00
Ball progression3965
Defensive impact7582
Role score6986
Transfer fit4572
Availability2252
Estimated Fee€2.9M€14M
Attack
Kim Min-jae
Creation
Kim Min-jae
Progression
Kim Min-jae
Defensive activity
Kim Min-jae
Value
Fabio Chiarodia
Overall fit
Kim Min-jae

Scouting recommendation

Kim Min-jae is a clear upgrade on role score (+17). Costs ~€11.1M more. Kim Min-jae is 9 years older — limited resale ceiling. Kim Min-jae wins attack; Kim Min-jae wins creation; Kim Min-jae wins progression; Kim Min-jae wins defensive activity.