Compare
Player Comparison
Choose two players for a side-by-side comparison: stats, radar overlay, category winners and a concise scouting recommendation. Estimated fees are model-derived, not official market values.
Player A
Diant Ramaj
Heidenheim · Bundesliga · Goalkeeper · Age 24
Player B
Zion Suzuki
Parma · Serie A · Goalkeeper · Age 23
Radar overlay
Diant RamajZion Suzuki
| Metric | Diant Ramaj | Zion Suzuki |
|---|---|---|
| Age↓ better | 24 | 23 |
| Position | GK | GK |
| Role | Goalkeeper | Goalkeeper |
| Radar group | GK | GK |
| Minutes | 2790 | 1800 |
| Sample | High | High |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 1 | 0 |
| G+A | 1 | 0 |
| Shots | 0 | 0 |
| Shots on Target | 0 | 0 |
| SoT % | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Crosses | 0 | 0 |
| Fouls drawn | 2 | 4 |
| Fouls committed↓ better | 2 | 0 |
| Tackles won | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Yellow cards↓ better | 2 | 1 |
| Attack impact | 0 | 0 |
| Chance creation | 0 | 0 |
| Ball progression | 0 | 0 |
| Defensive impact | 0 | 0 |
| Role score | 28 | 57 |
| Transfer fit | 56 | 64 |
| GK impact | 28 | 57 |
| Estimated Fee | €6.3M | €21M |
Attack
Diant Ramaj
Creation
Diant Ramaj
Progression
Zion Suzuki
Defensive activity
Zion Suzuki
Value
Diant Ramaj
Overall fit
Zion Suzuki
Scouting recommendation
Zion Suzuki is a clear upgrade on role score (+29). Costs ~€14.7M more. Similar ages. Diant Ramaj wins attack; Diant Ramaj wins creation; Zion Suzuki wins progression; Zion Suzuki wins defensive activity.