RebuildFC
Compare

Player Comparison

Choose two players for a side-by-side comparison: stats, radar overlay, category winners and a concise scouting recommendation. Estimated fees are model-derived, not official market values.

Player A
Amir Richardson
Fiorentina · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 24
Player B
Marco Palestra
Cagliari · Serie A · Central Midfielder · Age 21

Radar overlay

CreativeoutputShotthreatDefensiveactivityInterceptionsWidedeliveryPressresistanceAvailability
Amir RichardsonMarco Palestra
MetricAmir RichardsonMarco Palestra
Age↓ better2421
PositionMFMF,DF
RoleCentral MidfielderCentral Midfielder
Radar groupCMCM
Minutes423081
SampleLowHigh
Goals01
Assists04
G+A05
Shots129
Shots on Target07
SoT %0.024.1
Crosses1106
Fouls drawn3108
Fouls committed↓ better141
Tackles won135
Interceptions019
Yellow cards↓ better03
Attack impact6344
Chance creation4166
Ball progression6990
Defensive impact5443
Role score2862
Transfer fit2172
Availability1100
Estimated Fee€2.2M€31M
Attack
Marco Palestra
Creation
Marco Palestra
Progression
Marco Palestra
Defensive activity
Amir Richardson
Value
Amir Richardson
Overall fit
Marco Palestra

Scouting recommendation

Marco Palestra is a clear upgrade on role score (+34). Costs ~€28.8M more. Marco Palestra is 3 years younger — more resale runway. Marco Palestra wins attack; Marco Palestra wins creation; Marco Palestra wins progression; Amir Richardson wins defensive activity.